Point72 / Cubist Interview Questions
Quant researcher and data scientist interview problems from Point72 and its systematic arm Cubist: probability, statistics, regression, ML, brain-teasers, and clean coding.
Inside the Point72 / Cubist interview
Point72 is Steve Cohen's multi-strategy hedge fund, and Cubist is its systematic arm. Its Quant Researcher and Data Scientist loops emphasize statistical reasoning you can defend out loud: probability, regression and estimation, a working grasp of ML regularization, and clean coding.
What they test
The core is probability and expectation — Markov-chain hitting times, optimal stopping, and quick fair-value pricing of simple bets. Around it sits a distinctive statistics and regression block (variance computations, mean/median/mode ordering, slope algebra, collinearity) plus ML intuition on bagging and LASSO. A real coding set rounds it out, and brain-teasers screen for structured thinking.
The recurring shapes
Many problems reduce to a few moves: set up a recurrence or first-step decomposition for an expected count, exploit symmetry to collapse cases, or reason about an estimator's bias and variance. The regression questions reward knowing that a slope is just a scaled correlation, and the ML questions reward knowing what regularization does to collinear or redundant predictors.
How to approach
Narrate the model before computing: name the distribution, the conditioning, or the recurrence, then carry it to a clean closed form. For the systematic side, be ready to tie a statistical answer back to signals and data — why an estimator is consistent, when a series is stationary, what LASSO keeps. For coding, write correct, readable solutions and state the complexity.
Thirty problems leaning medium, with a spread of easy warm-ups and a handful of hard regression and coding questions to separate candidates.
Point72 / Cubist coding questions (7)
- Compose a List of Functions
- A Variable-Size Storage Type in C++
- Minimum Swaps to Balance Parentheses
- Optimal Festival Location to Minimize Total Travel
- Highest-Scoring Substring by Prefix and Suffix Matches
- Counting Strings by Longest Run of Consecutive Vowels
- Classify the Positional Relationship of Two Circles
Point72 / Cubist probability questions (6)
- Probability One Player Gets More Heads With an Extra Coin
- Russian Roulette With Two Adjacent Bullets
- Penney's Game: Whoever Throws the Tail After a Head Wins
- Probability the Sum of Uniforms Stays Below One
- Identifying a Two-Headed Coin After Ten Heads
- Pricing a Bet on Fewer Than 30 Heads in 100 Flips
Point72 / Cubist expected value questions (4)
Point72 / Cubist regression questions (3)
Point72 / Cubist statistics questions (3)
Point72 / Cubist brain teasers questions (2)
Point72 / Cubist time series questions (1)
Point72 / Cubist combinatorics questions (1)
Point72 / Cubist game theory questions (1)
Point72 / Cubist random variables questions (1)
Point72 / Cubist machine learning questions (1)
Point72 / Cubist interview FAQ
What kind of questions does Point72 / Cubist ask in quant interviews?
Candidates most often report coding, probability and expected value questions. This page collects 30 of them, 30 stamped with the month they were last reported — each with a full worked solution.
How hard are Point72 / Cubist interview questions?
The set spans 11 easy, 15 medium and 4 hard problems. Most sit at medium difficulty — solvable in a few minutes with clean reasoning — with a harder tail that rewards knowing the canonical tricks.
How do I prepare for the Point72 / Cubist quant interview?
Work through this set by topic (use the sidebar), starting from your weakest area. 3 problems are free to open with their full solution, so you can judge the quality before anything else. Then broaden out with the related firms below — the question families overlap heavily.
Are these the actual Point72 / Cubist interview questions?
They are built from candidate-reported Point72 / Cubist questions. We rewrite each prompt for clarity and author the worked solutions ourselves — we don't claim the wording is verbatim, and we never invent questions or recycle generic lists. 30 of 30 carry the month they were last reported.