Caplet Pricing and Delta Under Black's Model
A caplet is a simple but important rates instrument. At time $T$, it pays $N \cdot \max(L - K, 0)$, where $L$ is the LIBOR forward rate fixed at time $T - \tau$ (the reset date), $K$ is the strike rate, and $N$ is the notional.
Under Black's model, $L$ is lognormal under the $T$-forward measure, with constant volatility $\sigma$ over the interval $[0, T - \tau]$ (i.e., the accrual period has length $\tau$).
Work through the following parts:
- Write the caplet price in closed form in terms of $N$, $\tau$, $P(0,T)$, $F$, $K$, $\sigma$, and $T$, where $F$ is the current forward rate.
- Derive the delta $\partial \text{Price} / \partial F$, treating $P(0,T)$ as fixed.
- Explain why caplet delta behaves differently from equity call delta when rates are near zero, and how a displaced-diffusion model would modify the setup to handle the near-zero-rate regime.
Hints
- The caplet payoff at $T$ under the $T$-forward measure makes $L$ a martingale -- this is exactly the setup where Black's formula applies with $P(0,T)$ as the discount factor and $F$ as the 'forward price.'
- To get delta, differentiate $F \cdot N(d_1) - K \cdot N(d_2)$ with respect to $F$ -- the $N'$ terms cancel by the same identity used in the Black-Scholes delta derivation, leaving just $N(d_1)$.
- For part (c), think about what happens to $d_1 = \ln(F/K) / (\sigma\sqrt{T-\tau}) + \ldots$ as $F \to 0$: the log term blows up, making the formula unstable. Displaced diffusion replaces $F$ with $F + \alpha$ to avoid this singularity.
Worked Solution
How to Think About It: A caplet is just a call option on a forward interest rate, so the pricing structure mirrors Black-Scholes almost exactly. The key difference from equity options is the discounting: instead of $e^{-rT}$, you use the zero-coupon bond price $P(0,T)$, which is the natural numeraire under the $T$-forward measure. The forward rate $F$ plays the role of the stock price, and because $L$ is a martingale under the $T$-forward measure, the drift drops out and you get the same $N(d_1)$/$N(d_2)$ structure as Black-Scholes. The subtlety -- and what makes this interesting -- is the delta behavior near zero rates, where lognormality breaks down economically.
Quick Sanity Checks: Before writing formulas, check limiting cases. If $F \gg K$ (deep in-the-money), the caplet should be worth roughly $N \cdot \tau \cdot P(0,T) \cdot (F - K)$ -- just the discounted intrinsic value. If $F \ll K$ (deep out-of-the-money), it should be worth nearly zero. Delta should approach 1 deep ITM and 0 deep OTM. These are identical to equity call limits, and they should be -- the math is the same until we get to the near-zero-rate regime.
Derivation:
Part (a): Closed-Form Caplet Price
Under the $T$-forward measure $\mathbb{Q}^T$, the forward rate $L$ is a martingale starting at $F = F(0, T-\tau, T)$, the current forward rate for the period $[T-\tau, T]$. Black's model assumes:
$dL = \sigma L \, dW^T$
so that $L$ is lognormal at time $T - \tau$ with:
$L(T - \tau) = F \exp\!\left(-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2 (T - \tau) + \sigma W^T_{T-\tau}\right)$
The caplet price is:
$\text{Price} = P(0, T) \cdot \mathbb{E}^{\mathbb{Q}^T}\!\left[N \cdot \tau \cdot \max(L - K, 0)\right]$
Note: the $\tau$ factor converts the rate difference into a dollar amount (since LIBOR is a simple rate over $\tau$ years). Applying the standard lognormal call formula:
$\boxed{\text{Price} = N \cdot \tau \cdot P(0,T) \left[ F \cdot N(d_1) - K \cdot N(d_2) \right]}$
where:
$d_1 = \frac{\ln(F/K) + \frac{1}{2}\sigma^2(T-\tau)}{\sigma\sqrt{T-\tau}}, \qquad d_2 = d_1 - \sigma\sqrt{T-\tau}$
Here $N(\cdot)$ is the standard normal CDF. This is Black's formula for a caplet.
Part (b): Delta with Respect to F
Differentiate the price with respect to $F$, holding $P(0,T)$, $K$, $\sigma$, $\tau$ fixed. Using the same calculation as for Black-Scholes equity delta (the $d_1$ and $d_2$ terms contribute via the chain rule, but the $N'(d_1)$ and $N'(d_2)$ terms cancel):
$\boxed{\Delta = \frac{\partial \text{Price}}{\partial F} = N \cdot \tau \cdot P(0,T) \cdot N(d_1)}$
This is bounded between 0 and $N \cdot \tau \cdot P(0,T)$, approaching $N \cdot \tau \cdot P(0,T)$ deep ITM and 0 deep OTM.
Part (c): Near-Zero Rates and Displaced Diffusion
The issue with lognormality near zero: Black's model assumes $dL = \sigma L \, dW^T$. When $F \to 0$, the absolute volatility $\sigma L$ also goes to zero, so the model effectively says the forward rate cannot go negative and barely moves when rates are low. This is the right behavior if rates must stay positive, but in practice:
- Rates can and do go negative (as seen in Europe and Japan post-2008).
- Near zero, a 1% absolute move represents an enormous percentage change, so lognormal vols become unstable and enormous.
- Hedging ratios ($N(d_1)$ terms) become unreliable because $d_1$ blows up when $F$ is small.
For equity, these issues do not arise -- stock prices are bounded below by zero and rarely get close to it in liquid markets. The equity lognormal model is well-behaved for typical parameter ranges.
The displaced-diffusion (DD) fix: replace the lognormal assumption with:
$d(L + \alpha) = \sigma_{\text{DD}} (L + \alpha) \, dW^T$
where $\alpha > 0$ is the displacement. This shifts the forward rate up by $\alpha$, so the effective "stock" in the Black formula is $F + \alpha$ and the effective strike is $K + \alpha$:
$\text{Price}_{\text{DD}} = N \cdot \tau \cdot P(0,T) \left[ (F + \alpha) N(d_1^{\text{DD}}) - (K + \alpha) N(d_2^{\text{DD}}) \right]$
with $d_1^{\text{DD}}$ and $d_2^{\text{DD}}$ using $(F+\alpha)/(K+\alpha)$ and $\sigma_{\text{DD}}$ in place of $F/K$ and $\sigma$. The displacement $\alpha$ allows rates to go as low as $-\alpha$ while preserving analytical tractability. The delta becomes:
$\Delta_{\text{DD}} = N \cdot \tau \cdot P(0,T) \cdot N(d_1^{\text{DD}})$
which is better behaved near zero and allows for non-zero sensitivity even when $F$ is very small.
Answer: The caplet price under Black's model is $N \cdot \tau \cdot P(0,T)[F \cdot N(d_1) - K \cdot N(d_2)]$ with standard log-moneyness $d_1$, $d_2$. Delta is $N \cdot \tau \cdot P(0,T) \cdot N(d_1)$. Near zero rates, lognormality is problematic because absolute vol collapses and rates cannot go negative; displaced diffusion shifts the process by $\alpha$ to restore tractability and allow negative rates.
Intuition
The caplet pricing formula is structurally identical to Black-Scholes for a call option, and that is no coincidence -- both are applications of the same change-of-numeraire machinery. When you pick the right numeraire (the zero-coupon bond $P(0,T)$ for rates, the money market account for equities), the underlying becomes a martingale and the lognormal assumption gives you the same $N(d_1)$/$N(d_2)$ structure every time. This is the core insight of the Heath-Jarrow-Morton and Brace-Gatarek-Musiela frameworks: price in the right measure and the problem collapses to something familiar.
The near-zero-rate issue is a good example of a model breaking down at its boundary. Lognormal models are elegant but they embed the assumption that relative moves matter more than absolute moves -- fine for equities, problematic for rates near zero. In practice, the post-2008 rate environment forced traders to either use displaced diffusion (a quick fix), SABR (which has a mixing parameter $\beta$ that interpolates between normal and lognormal), or full normal vol models. The lesson: always ask what the model implies at the boundary, and know which market regimes make your model assumptions fail.