Cross-Asset Market Making with Correlated Fundamentals

Market Microstructure · Hard · Free problem

You are a market maker quoting two correlated assets simultaneously. The latent (true) values $(V_1, V_2)$ are jointly normal:

$$(V_1, V_2) \sim N\!\left(\begin{pmatrix}\mu_1 \\ \mu_2\end{pmatrix},\ \begin{pmatrix}\sigma_1^2 & \rho\sigma_1\sigma_2 \\ \rho\sigma_1\sigma_2 & \sigma_2^2\end{pmatrix}\right)$$

with correlation $\rho \in (-1, 1)$. You quote one share on each side for both assets. Your bid/ask for asset 1 are shifted from the mid by a skew term $k_1 I_1 + k_2 I_2$, where $I_1, I_2$ are your current inventory positions in each asset.

Order flow is adversarial: each incoming trader observes a Gaussian signal $S_j = V_j + \epsilon_j$ with $\epsilon_j \sim N(0, \sigma^2)$ (independent of $V_j$) and trades against the most favorable quote.

Derive the inventory-optimal hedging coefficients $(k_1, k_2)$ -- the skew parameters that equalize the conditional expected loss on asset 1 fills given the joint inventory $(I_1, I_2)$. In particular, explain why $k_2 \neq 0$: why does inventory in asset 2 affect how you skew asset 1?

Hints

  1. Think about what drives the inventory skew in single-asset market making first -- then ask how correlation changes the effective exposure.
  2. The marginal contribution of asset 1 inventory to portfolio variance is $2(\sigma_1^2 I_1 + \rho\sigma_1\sigma_2 I_2)$. The optimal skew should be proportional to this gradient.
  3. The ratio $k_2/k_1 = \rho\sigma_2/\sigma_1$ is the OLS regression coefficient of $V_2$ on $V_1$ -- equivalently, the standard cross-asset hedge ratio.

Worked Solution

How to Think About It: This is a cross-asset adverse selection problem. In single-asset market making, you skew your quotes to manage inventory risk -- the bigger your long position, the more you shade your bid down to attract sellers. With two correlated assets, it is more subtle: a large long position in asset 2, combined with positive correlation $\rho$, means you are also effectively long on asset 1 (in a value sense). You should shade asset 1 quotes too, even if your asset 1 inventory is zero. The hedging coefficients $(k_1, k_2)$ capture this cross-asset effect.

The key is to work with the conditional distribution of $V_1$ given the signal and inventory context, then equalize the expected P\&L on each side of the market.

Key Insight: Under a Gaussian model, the optimal skew is linear in inventories. The coefficient $k_2$ on asset 2 inventory is proportional to $\rho \cdot \frac{\sigma_1}{\sigma_2}$ -- the correlation scaled by the relative volatilities. This is exactly the hedge ratio you would use to hedge asset 1 risk with asset 2.

The Method:

Step 1: Posterior on $V_1$ given signal $S_1$. The trader observes $S_1 = V_1 + \epsilon_1$ with $\epsilon_1 \sim N(0, \sigma^2)$. By standard Gaussian updating, the posterior mean of $V_1$ given $S_1$ is:

$$E[V_1 | S_1] = \mu_1 + \frac{\sigma_1^2}{\sigma_1^2 + \sigma^2}(S_1 - \mu_1)$$

Let $\alpha = \frac{\sigma_1^2}{\sigma_1^2 + \sigma^2} \in (0,1)$ be the signal weight (informativeness).

Step 2: Inventory-adjusted mid. Your effective mid for asset 1, accounting for inventory risk, should be:

$$m_1^{\text{adj}} = \mu_1 - (k_1 I_1 + k_2 I_2)$$

The skew shifts the mid: a long position ($I_1 > 0$) lowers your effective mid so you sell cheaper and buy more expensively, reducing inventory.

Step 3: Equalize expected loss. A buy order on asset 1 arrives at ask $a_1 = m_1^{\text{adj}} + s$ (half-spread $s$). The informed trader buys only if $E[V_1|S_1] > a_1$. Your expected loss per informed buy is:

$$E[V_1 - a_1 | \text{buy}] = E\left[E[V_1|S_1] - a_1 \,\Big|\, E[V_1|S_1] > a_1\right]$$

For the symmetric case (zero inventory, symmetric spread), this equals $\alpha \cdot \phi(s/\tilde{\sigma}) / (1 - \Phi(s/\tilde{\sigma}))$ times $\tilde{\sigma}$ -- the standard adverse selection cost, where $\tilde{\sigma}^2 = \sigma_1^2 \sigma^2/(\sigma_1^2 + \sigma^2)$ is the posterior standard deviation.

Step 4: Cross-asset term. With joint inventory $(I_1, I_2)$, the risk to the market maker is not just inventory in asset 1 but also correlated exposure from asset 2. The P\&L variance from holding $(I_1, I_2)$ is:

$$\text{Var}(I_1 V_1 + I_2 V_2) = I_1^2 \sigma_1^2 + 2\rho\sigma_1\sigma_2 I_1 I_2 + I_2^2 \sigma_2^2$$

To flatten this exposure, the optimal skew on asset 1 must include a term proportional to $I_2$ that reflects the marginal contribution of asset 1 trades to the portfolio variance. Differentiating the portfolio variance with respect to $I_1$:

$$\frac{\partial}{\partial I_1}\text{Var} = 2(\sigma_1^2 I_1 + \rho\sigma_1\sigma_2 I_2)$$

Setting this proportional to the skew gives the optimal hedging coefficients:

$$k_1 = \gamma \sigma_1^2, \qquad k_2 = \gamma \rho\sigma_1\sigma_2$$

where $\gamma > 0$ is a risk aversion parameter (chosen to balance inventory cost against spread revenue).

Practical Considerations: The ratio $k_2 / k_1 = \rho \sigma_2/\sigma_1$ is exactly the regression coefficient of $V_2$ on $V_1$ -- i.e., the minimum-variance hedge ratio. This makes intuitive sense: you are hedging your asset 2 inventory risk by skewing asset 1 quotes in the direction that reduces your net correlated exposure. When $\rho = 0$, $k_2 = 0$ and the assets decouple. When $|\rho| \to 1$, the cross-skew dominates.

Answer: The inventory-optimal hedging coefficients are $k_1 = \gamma\sigma_1^2$ and $k_2 = \gamma\rho\sigma_1\sigma_2$, where $\gamma$ is the market maker's risk aversion. The cross-asset skew $k_2 \neq 0$ because correlated inventory in asset 2 creates effective exposure to $V_1$ -- the correct skew accounts for the full correlated portfolio risk, not just single-asset inventory.

Intuition

This problem captures a real practical challenge in electronic market making: when you run books on correlated products simultaneously, you cannot manage each book in isolation. A large long in one asset effectively exposes you to moves in correlated assets even if your inventory there is zero. The optimal response is to cross-skew: shade the quotes on asset 1 in response to inventory in asset 2, with the cross-sensitivity determined by the hedge ratio $\rho\sigma_1/\sigma_2$.

The deeper point is that market making with multiple correlated assets is fundamentally a portfolio problem. The inventory skew that minimizes risk is the gradient of the portfolio variance with respect to each position -- and that gradient has off-diagonal terms whenever assets are correlated. Missing these cross-terms means you are leaving systematic risk on the table. In practice, major electronic market makers (fixed income desks quoting correlated bonds, options desks managing correlated underlyings) all implement some version of this cross-skew logic.

Open the full interactive solver →