Expected Number of Uniforms to Exceed a Threshold
Draw i.i.d. uniform random variables $X_1, X_2, \ldots$ from $U[0,1]$ and let $S_n = X_1 + X_2 + \cdots + X_n$. Define the stopping time
$$T = \min\{n : S_n > 1\}.$$
- Show that $E[T] = e$.
- Generalize: for a threshold $c > 0$, let $T_c = \min\{n : S_n > c\}$. Find $E[T_c]$.
Hints
- Think about what the event $\{T > n\}$ means geometrically -- where do $n$ uniform draws land if they haven't exceeded the threshold yet?
- The volume of the region $\{(x_1, \ldots, x_n) \in [0,1]^n : \sum x_i \le 1\}$ is $1/n!$. This is the standard $n$-simplex.
- Use the tail-sum formula $E[T] = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} P(T > n)$ and recognize the resulting series as the Taylor expansion of $e$.
Worked Solution
How to Think About It: You are drawing uniform random numbers and adding them up until you pass 1. How many draws does that take on average? Each draw contributes about $1/2$ on average, so you'd guess roughly 2 draws -- but that ignores the fact that you often overshoot or undershoot. The real answer is $e \approx 2.718$, which is surprisingly clean. The key insight is that the probability of needing more than $n$ draws is exactly $1/n!$, because the event $\{T > n\}$ is the same as the event $\{S_n \le 1\}$, and the volume of the region where $n$ uniform random variables sum to at most 1 is the volume of the standard $n$-simplex, which is $1/n!$.
Quick Estimate: Each $X_i$ has mean $1/2$, so after 2 draws the expected sum is 1. But you need to *exceed* 1, and sometimes you get unlucky with small draws. A rough guess: somewhere between 2.5 and 3. The exact answer $e \approx 2.718$ fits right in that range. You can also simulate: draw a few thousand trials on a computer and you will see the average converge to $e$.
Approach: Use the tail-sum formula for expectation $E[T] = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} P(T > n)$ and compute each tail probability as a simplex volume.
Formal Solution:
Define $T = \min\{n : S_n > 1\}$. Note that $\{T > n\}$ is the event $\{S_n \le 1\}$, i.e., the first $n$ draws all contribute to a partial sum that has not yet exceeded 1.
The probability $P(S_n \le 1)$ is the volume of the region
$$\{(x_1, \ldots, x_n) \in [0,1]^n : x_1 + \cdots + x_n \le 1\}.$$
Since each $x_i \in [0,1]$ and the constraint $\sum x_i \le 1$ already forces each $x_i \le 1$, this region is exactly the standard $n$-simplex $\Delta_n$. Its volume is
$$\text{Vol}(\Delta_n) = \frac{1}{n!}.$$
So $P(T > n) = 1/n!$. Applying the tail-sum formula for expectation:
$$E[T] = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} P(T > n) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n!} = e.$$
Generalization to threshold $c > 0$:
For $T_c = \min\{n : S_n > c\}$, we need
$$P(T_c > n) = P(S_n \le c) = \text{Vol}\{(x_1, \ldots, x_n) \in [0,1]^n : x_1 + \cdots + x_n \le c\}.$$
For $0 < c \le 1$, this is simply $c^n / n!$ (scaled simplex), so
$$E[T_c] = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{c^n}{n!} = e^c.$$
For general $c > 0$ (including $c > 1$), the region is no longer a simplex because the $[0,1]^n$ box constraint binds. By inclusion-exclusion, the volume is the Irwin-Hall CDF:
$$P(S_n \le c) = \frac{1}{n!} \sum_{j=0}^{\lfloor c \rfloor} (-1)^j \binom{n}{j}(c - j)^n.$$
Then
$$E[T_c] = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} P(S_n \le c).$$
For integer thresholds, closed forms exist. For example: - $c = 1$: $E[T_1] = e \approx 2.718$ - $c = 2$: $E[T_2] = \frac{e^2 + e}{2} \approx 5.053$
In general, for integer $c = k$, $E[T_k]$ can be expressed in terms of powers of $e$ with rational coefficients.
Answer: $E[T] = e$. For threshold $0 < c \le 1$, $E[T_c] = e^c$. For general $c$, $E[T_c] = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} P(S_n \le c)$ where each term uses the Irwin-Hall inclusion-exclusion formula.
Intuition
The magic behind $E[T] = e$ is that the standard simplex -- the set of nonneg points summing to at most 1 -- has volume exactly $1/n!$, which is also the reciprocal of $n$ factorial appearing in the Taylor series for $e$. So the tail-sum formula for expectation directly produces the exponential series. This is one of those beautiful coincidences where a geometric fact (simplex volume) meets an analytic identity (the series for $e$).
In practice, this result shows up as a fun interview question because it tests whether a candidate can connect a concrete probabilistic setup to a clean geometric argument. The generalization to arbitrary $c$ brings in inclusion-exclusion (the Irwin-Hall distribution), which is a workhorse in order statistics and quantitative finance whenever you need the distribution of sums of uniforms -- for instance, when modeling aggregated random arrival times or cumulative uniform shocks.